GOAIR.in vs GOINDIGO.in We often believe that war is hell, but in reality there is a big difference between them. Hell has been interpreted by multiple religious texts in various different ways but they all have a same basic foundation, They all state that hell is a place for sinners but on the other hand war is something entirely different. …

Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are. The given dispute states that justice is not only blind, but deaf too. Which means that the current system of justice in INDRP may provide everyone an equal chance just for the sake of formality, but for some reason it’s ears are usually …

From great many years domain investors have been wrongly compared to cyber squatters, Due to the lack of awareness regarding this industry, arbitrators have ignored the rights of the the domain investors during the INDRP disputes and have favored the plaintiffs with deep pockets…Until now. Recently an arbitrator understood this on going problem and took over the case differently. For …

Complainant – NAVISTAR INC Respondent – YAZDI TANTRA Disputed Domain – Transtar.in Decision – The Respondent emerges as the decree holder. Case Summary and Analysis Complainant is a company incorporated under the laws of United States of America and is the worlds leading manufacturer and trader of commercial vehicles and automobile engines. The complainant has adopted the trademark “TRANSTAR” since …

According to our law books and theories, Justice is defined as the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness, But practically justice in our current era is something you search for years but you lose everything you find, it is a system where there’s braille for the deaf and a signpost for the blind, there’s heaven for the …

Complainant : BLACKHAWK NETWORK, INC Respondent : ANAND SRIVASTAV Disputed domain : Reloadit.net.in Decision : The Complainant emerged as a decree holder. Case summary and Analysis In the given dispute complainant is the leading provider of the prepaid and financial payment products and services which was founded in 2001. The complainant is the registered owner of “RELOADIT”. The complainant supports …

Complainant : NIKE INC and NIKE INNOVATIVE Respondent : ZHAXIA Disputed domain : Nike.co.in Decision : The Complainant emerged as a decree holder. Case summary and Analysis In the following dispute the complainant owns exclusive rights to use “Nike” trademark and service mark and has used the same in connection with its highly successful and widely known lines of sports …

Complainant : ETERNO INFOTECH PVT LTD Respondent : ZHENG WEI Disputed domain : Huntnews.in Decision : The complainant emereged as a decree holder and was awarded compensation of rupees 1 lakh by the respondent. Case Summary and Analysis Complainant is a global leader in the area of design and development of computer software. The complainant launched the news aggregation and …

In our previous post we discussed about different tactics that can be used to counter allegations used by the complainant, We discussed different ways to file a reply during an INDRP dispute. The yodha.in series were initiated so you can learn how to fight your own INDRP disputes, if you have missed previous posts then you can check it out …

In our previous post we discussed what are the basic grounds that complainant will use against you (respondent) during an INDRP dispute, Yodha.in was initiated in order to help respondents understand different battle tactics and strategies that can be used during an INDRP dispute in order to help them win the dispute. If you happen to miss our previous posts …