Tag Archives: Indrp Dispute Decision

INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW – FABERINDIASRVICECENTER.IN

Complainant –  Faber Industrie S.P.A. Respondent – Aditya Narayan Disputed Domain – faberindiasrvicecenter.in Decision – faberindiasrvicecenter.in is awarded to Faber Industrie S.P.A. Case Summary: Complainant Overview: In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Faber Industrie S.P.A”. The complainant is the first company to make kitchen hoods, founded in the year 1955.Its the best company till date in both the quality and quantity.Over 2,000 …

Read More »

INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW – FORMULE1.IN

Complainant –  Formula One Licensing B.V Respondent – M.r.Sachin Sahrawat DisputedDomain – formule1.in Decision – formule1.in is awarded to Formula One Licensing B.V Case Summary: Complainant : In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Formula One Licensing B.V”.The Complainant holds the trademark formula 1 in India under the trademark act 1999 under a lot of classes.The Complainant contends that formula 1 …

Read More »

INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW – NEXUSAUTO.IN

Complainant –  M/s Nexus Automotive International S.A. Respondent – ShopZok DisputedDomain – nexusauto.in Decision – nexusauto.in is awarded to M/s Nexus Automotive International S.A. Case Summary: Complainant : In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Nexus Automotive International”.The complainant is a an international automotive group belongs to Switzerland and is engaged in the business of providing distributorship and supply of automotive parts and …

Read More »

INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW – PUMA.IN – A BIASED DECISION!

Complainant –  Puma Se Respondent – Christian Schmidt DisputedDomain – puma.in Decision – Puma.in is awarded to Puma Se Case Summary: Complainant : In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Puma Se”.The complainant owns several businesses like manufacturing,marketing ,sports shoes,accessories,Flipflops,T-shirts,shorts,bags,wallets and other accessories and equipment with high quality. The complainant registered the trademark PUMA in 1948 by Rudolf Dassler and has been widely …

Read More »

INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW – APANAGHAR.IN

Complainant: Mr Pradeep Misra Respondent: Radiantly Life and Jeevan Deep Services Pvt Ltd. Disputed Domain: Apanaghar.in Decision:  complaint has denied, Apanaghar.in to remain with the respondent. Case Summary: The complainant is the founder & director of Rudrabhishek Enterprises Ltd.The complainant holds  Real Estate Consultancy for the last 25 years and also providing wide range of services including Urban Planning, Architectural Designing, Structural Designing. The complainant registered the trademark “APNA GHAR” as …

Read More »

INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW – LEGOEDUCATION.IN

Complainant: LEGO Juris A/s Respondent: Virginia Barham Disputed Domain: www.legoeducation.in Decision: Legoeducation.in is forwarded to Lego Juris A/S Case Summary: In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “LEGO”, Lego is a Denmark based company and they are preferring toys and other LEGO branded products.The complainant owns 5000 domain names related to lego.The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the …

Read More »

INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW – LECREUSET.CO.IN

Complainant –  Le creuset Respondent – Yitao, Apex consulting DisputedDomain – lecreuset.co.in Decision – lecreuset.co.in is awarded to Le creuset Case Summary: Complainant : In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Le creuset”.The complainant is a leading distributor of cast iron cookware in France and also owns the trademark “LE CREUSET”.Le Creuset India Trading Pvt Ltd is the complainant India’s subsidiary …

Read More »

INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW – MOZILLA.CO.IN

Complainant –  Mozilla Foundation & Mozilla Corporation Respondent –   Lina, Doublefist Limited Disputed Domain – www.mozilla.co.in Decision –  Mozilla.co.in is awarded to Mozilla Foundation Case Summary: In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Mozilla Firefox internet browser” in 1998.Complainant started registering domains related to Mozilla from that time, Complainant owns many country code extensions like mozilla.com, mozilla.in,mozilla.net..etc,Complainant got many awards too, Complainant …

Read More »

INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW – MANTRUCKANDBUS.CO.IN

Complainant –  Man Truck and Bus, AG Respondent – Abhimanyu Sikarwar DisputedDomain – mantruckandbus.co.in Decision –  mantruckandbus.co.in is awarded to Man Truck and Bus, AG Case Summary: Complainant : In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Man Truck and Bus, AG. The complainant owns several websites like mantruckandbus.com,mantrucksindia.com man.eu,truck.man.eu having global and india access.The complainant is one of the Europeans leading manufacture of …

Read More »

INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW – LYCAMOBILE.IN

Complainant –  Pettigo Comercio Internacional Lda Respondent – Mohammed Zubel DisputedDomain – lycamobile.in Decision – lycamobile.in is awarded to Pettigo Comercio Internacional Lda Case Summary: Complainant : In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Pettigo Comercio Internacional Lda”. On march 2011,the complainant coined and adopted the trademarks “LYCA” and “LYCA TEL” and also have proper licence to trademarks like LYCAMOBILE,LYCATALK ,LYCAFLY AND LYCAHOLIDAYS. …

Read More »

Subscribe For Latest Updates