In my previous post we discussed the need of education about INDRP procedures and how you can fight the dispute as a respondent. To fulfill this necessity we launched Yodha.in, where we will be covering every aspect of fighting an INDRP dispute as a respondent. We also covered a very popular dispute Jagdish purohit V. Stephen Koeing where the disputed domain …
Read More »Jashan Sekhon
Pending INDRP Dispute Resolution: Arevaindia.in
Domain name – Arevaindia.in Date of allocation of complainant to the arbitrator – 04.07.2016 Name of Arbitrator – Mr Ankur Raheja Domain ID:D5296701-AFIN Domain Name:AREVAINDIA.IN Created On:09-Sep-2011 09:48:42 UTC Last Updated On:26-May-2016 12:10:34 UTC Expiration Date:09-Sep-2016 09:48:42 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:Net4India (R7-AFIN) Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED Reason: Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED Reason: Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED Reason: Status:DELETE PROHIBITED Reason: Status:RENEW PROHIBITED Reason: Status:TRANSFER …
Read More »Yodha.in – How to fight against INDRP dispute as a respondent. #SpecialLegalSeries. #ArtofWar
How to fight against INDRP dispute as a respondent? After my previous post I have received good number of messages where people were seeking knowledge and consultation about different INDRP cases. I felt it is necessary that one should know how to protect his/her domain when faced with a challenge. Plus in most of the cases the complainant fight through …
Read More »INDRP dispute review : WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT INC v. SHIWANGI PESWANI
Complainant : World Wrestling Entertainment Inc, United states of America Respondent : Shiwangi Peswani, Uttar pradesh, India Decision : From the findings below it was concluded that the complainant is entitled to the disputed domain name. Case Summary : Not every wrestling ends with entertainment, In the given judgement the disputed domain is WWEliveindia.in. The complainant ambushed the respondent with multiple …
Read More »INDRP Disputes Review : Axalt Coating Systems, USA & Coatings Foreign IP Co LLC v. OM Narayan
In the given case, there are two complainants. First Complainant : Axalt Coating Systems, USA & Coatings Foreign IP Co LLC, who is a leading global coatings company dedicated to the development, manufacture and sale of liquid and powder coatings. Second Complainant: Coatings Foreign IP Co, LLC is an entity organized and existing under the laws of USA, the second …
Read More »