Tag Archives: INDRP Disputes

Complainant : BLACKHAWK NETWORK, INC Respondent : ANAND SRIVASTAV Disputed domain : Reloadit.net.in Decision : The Complainant emerged as a decree holder. Case summary and Analysis In the given dispute complainant is the leading provider of the prepaid and financial payment products and services which was founded in 2001. The complainant is the registered owner of “RELOADIT”. The complainant supports …

Complainant : NIKE INC and NIKE INNOVATIVE Respondent : ZHAXIA Disputed domain : Nike.co.in Decision : The Complainant emerged as a decree holder. Case summary and Analysis In the following dispute the complainant owns exclusive rights to use “Nike” trademark and service mark and has used the same in connection with its highly successful and widely known lines of sports …

Complainant : ETERNO INFOTECH PVT LTD Respondent : ZHENG WEI Disputed domain : Huntnews.in Decision : The complainant emereged as a decree holder and was awarded compensation of rupees 1 lakh by the respondent. Case Summary and Analysis Complainant is a global leader in the area of design and development of computer software. The complainant launched the news aggregation and …

In our previous post we discussed about different tactics that can be used to counter allegations used by the complainant, We discussed different ways to file a reply during an INDRP dispute. The yodha.in series were initiated so you can learn how to fight your own INDRP disputes, if you have missed previous posts then you can check it out …

In our previous post we discussed what are the basic grounds that complainant will use against you (respondent) during an INDRP dispute, Yodha.in was initiated in order to help respondents understand different battle tactics and strategies that can be used during an INDRP dispute in order to help them win the dispute. If you happen to miss our previous posts …

In my previous post we discussed the need of education about INDRP procedures and how you can fight the dispute as a respondent. To fulfill this necessity we launched Yodha.in, where we will be covering every aspect of fighting an INDRP dispute as a respondent. We also covered a very popular dispute Jagdish purohit V. Stephen Koeing where the disputed domain …

Domain name – Arevaindia.in Date of allocation of complainant to the arbitrator – 04.07.2016 Name of Arbitrator – Mr Ankur Raheja Domain ID:D5296701-AFIN Domain Name:AREVAINDIA.IN Created On:09-Sep-2011 09:48:42 UTC Last Updated On:26-May-2016 12:10:34 UTC Expiration Date:09-Sep-2016 09:48:42 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:Net4India (R7-AFIN) Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED Reason: Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED Reason: Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED Reason: Status:DELETE PROHIBITED Reason: Status:RENEW PROHIBITED Reason: Status:TRANSFER …

How to fight against INDRP dispute as a respondent? After my previous post I have received good number of messages where people were seeking knowledge and consultation about different INDRP cases. I felt it is necessary that one should know how to protect his/her domain when faced with a challenge. Plus in most of the cases the complainant fight through …

Complainant : World Wrestling Entertainment Inc, United states of America Respondent : Shiwangi Peswani, Uttar pradesh, India Decision : From the findings below it was concluded that the complainant is entitled to the disputed domain name. Case Summary : Not every wrestling ends with entertainment, In the given judgement the disputed domain is WWEliveindia.in. The complainant ambushed the respondent with multiple …

In the given case, there are two complainants. First Complainant : Axalt Coating Systems, USA & Coatings Foreign IP Co LLC, who is a leading global coatings company dedicated to the development, manufacture and sale of liquid and powder coatings. Second Complainant:  Coatings Foreign IP Co, LLC is an entity organized and existing under the laws of USA, the second …