Tag Archives: INDRP Disputes

NIXI (INRegistry) has invited the applications from potential candidates to act as INDRP arbitrators in accordance with the .IN INDRP dispute policy. 27 Independent arbitrators are already supporting INDRP dispute resolutions so far , now these two members addition will bring the total number of certified INDRP arbitrators to 29 members. Registry announcement can be accessed using the reference link …

Complainant Kimberly Clark Worldwide Inc , Neenah,Wisconsin 5496, United States of America Vs. Respondent Lin Yanxiao, Panyu, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China Huggies is the brand name of a disposable diaper marketed by Kimberly-Clark and indeed is a world wide reputed brand. They has submitted the evidence for almost 9 different trademarks for the word “Huggies” including an a trade mark …

.IN registry website has announced the code of conduct INDRP arbitrators has to follow for conducting arbitration proceedings, following this code of conduct is a must. If any party beliefs arbitrator is biased or not following the code of conduct they can feel free to report this to .IN registry. Please refer the registry reference link for further details: .INDRP …

A total of 9 INDRP Dispute Decisions are pending at moment , one can track the list of pending decisions time to time using .IN registry website , here is the link: Pending Dispute Decisions. Most of them are looking to be very obvious trademarks and specially looking to be quite popular trademarks , worth waiting to read the dispute …

GOAIR.in vs GOINDIGO.in We often believe that war is hell, but in reality there is a big difference between them. Hell has been interpreted by multiple religious texts in various different ways but they all have a same basic foundation, They all state that hell is a place for sinners but on the other hand war is something entirely different. …

Efty.com launched 33 new For-Sale landers for Efty users today and 3 of them are specifically designed to help owners of .in domain names to protect themselves from an INDRP dispute. Glad to see .IN names getting special attention from Efty.com. INDRP Safe 1 INDRP Safe 2 INDRP Safe 3 INDRP landers are designed specially to address the needs of …

Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are. The given dispute states that justice is not only blind, but deaf too. Which means that the current system of justice in INDRP may provide everyone an equal chance just for the sake of formality, but for some reason it’s ears are usually …

From great many years domain investors have been wrongly compared to cyber squatters, Due to the lack of awareness regarding this industry, arbitrators have ignored the rights of the the domain investors during the INDRP disputes and have favored the plaintiffs with deep pockets…Until now. Recently an arbitrator understood this on going problem and took over the case differently. For …

Complainant – NAVISTAR INC Respondent – YAZDI TANTRA Disputed Domain – Transtar.in Decision – The Respondent emerges as the decree holder. Case Summary and Analysis Complainant is a company incorporated under the laws of United States of America and is the worlds leading manufacturer and trader of commercial vehicles and automobile engines. The complainant has adopted the trademark “TRANSTAR” since …

According to our law books and theories, Justice is defined as the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness, But practically justice in our current era is something you search for years but you lose everything you find, it is a system where there’s braille for the deaf and a signpost for the blind, there’s heaven for the …