Tag Archives: Indrp Dispute Decision

Complainant –  Mastercard International Inc. Respondent – M/s Champion Software Technologies Limited Disputed Domain – MASTERPAY.CO.IN Decision –  Complaint has declined and Masterpay.co.in will remain with  M/s Champion Software Technologies Limited. INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW –MASTERPAY.CO.IN Case Summary: Complainant In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Mastercard International Inc“.It is a multinational company. The complainant is a technology-driven company uses technology and data-driven …

Complainant –  Indeed, Inc. Respondent – Deepak Singh Disputed Domain – Indeedjob.net.in Decision –  Indeedjob.net.in is awarded to Indeed, Inc. Case Summary: Complainant In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Indeed, Inc“.The Complainant is the world’s largest job site with over 200million unique visitors every month from over 60 different countries. The complainant helps companies of all sizes hire employees and …

Complainant –  Mastercard International Incorporated Respondent – M/s Champion Software Technologies Limited Disputed Domain – MASTERPAY.IN Decision –  Complaint has declined and Masterpay.in will remain with  M/s Champion Software Technologies Limited. INDRP DISPUTE DECISION REVIEW –MASTERPAY.IN Case Summary: Complainant In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Mastercard International Incorporated “.Complainant owns a multinational company. The complainant is a technology-driven company and is …

Complainant –  Oracle America, INC. Respondent – Fita Academy. Disputed Domain – javatrainingchennai.co.in Decision – javatrainingchennai.co.in is awarded to Oracle America, INC. Case Summary: Complainant In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Oracle America, INC”.The complainant is an integral part of The Oracle Family of Companies, which is a software company and an international giant in the field of development, …

Complainant –  American Airlines, Inc. Respondent – Ding Ri Guo Disputed Domain – americanairlines.co.in Decision – americanairlines.co.in is awarded to American Airlines, Inc. Case Summary: Complainant: In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as ‘American Airlines, Inc’.The complainant has stated that it is the owner and proprietor of several well-known trademarks around the world like AMERICAN AIRLINES, AA.COMMAADVANTAGE EXECUTIVE, PLATINUM, ADVANTAGE AND ADVANTAGE PLATINUM. The …

Complainant –  Google LLC. Respondent – Nishant Kaundal. Disputed Domain – googletezupiapp.in Decision – googletezupiapp.in is awarded to Google LLC. Case Summary: Complainant: In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Google LLC”.We all know that Google is the top search engine in the world.The complainant ‘Google’ owns several trademarks including Google and Tez.Google is the worlds second most valuable …

Complainant –  Faber Industrie S.P.A. Respondent – Aditya Narayan Disputed Domain – faberindiasrvicecenter.in Decision – faberindiasrvicecenter.in is awarded to Faber Industrie S.P.A. Case Summary: Complainant Overview: In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Faber Industrie S.P.A”. The complainant is the first company to make kitchen hoods, founded in the year 1955.Its the best company till date in both the quality and quantity.Over 2,000 …

Complainant –  Formula One Licensing B.V Respondent – M.r.Sachin Sahrawat DisputedDomain – formule1.in Decision – formule1.in is awarded to Formula One Licensing B.V Case Summary: Complainant : In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Formula One Licensing B.V”.The Complainant holds the trademark formula 1 in India under the trademark act 1999 under a lot of classes.The Complainant contends that formula 1 …

Complainant –  M/s Nexus Automotive International S.A. Respondent – ShopZok DisputedDomain – nexusauto.in Decision – nexusauto.in is awarded to M/s Nexus Automotive International S.A. Case Summary: Complainant : In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Nexus Automotive International”.The complainant is a an international automotive group belongs to Switzerland and is engaged in the business of providing distributorship and supply of automotive parts and …

Complainant –  Puma Se Respondent – Christian Schmidt DisputedDomain – puma.in Decision – Puma.in is awarded to Puma Se Case Summary: Complainant : In the given dispute the complainant was incorporated as “Puma Se”.The complainant owns several businesses like manufacturing,marketing ,sports shoes,accessories,Flipflops,T-shirts,shorts,bags,wallets and other accessories and equipment with high quality. The complainant registered the trademark PUMA in 1948 by Rudolf Dassler and has been widely …